The Imaginary Debt Crisis
by Benjamin Studebaker
Lots of people think the United States has a debt problem. Lots of people are wrong. Here’s why.
When you’re reading a story about the debt in the media, typically they’ll try to shock and awe you with the sheer scale of the numbers–the debt is out of control, they’ll say, we’re 15 trillion in debt (the total amount of money the government owes), with annual deficits of over 1 trillion dollars! Plus, they’ll say, it’s all owed to China, and if China ever decided not to buy American debt, we’d be sunk! Surely this is cause for alarm, cause for panic! Surely we should be slicing government spending left and right, firing all of the teachers and cutting public sector benefits and never ever going anywhere near stimulus spending. These large figures are, however, extremely misleading.
A quick look, first, at what the debt actually is. The US government borrows money by selling off treasury bills and bonds. Typically the US government offers these bills at a rate of interest. So if you buy a 10-Year US Treasury Bond, you’re buying a bond that matures in 10 years, and pays some amount of interest to the holder of that debt, which is the interest rate, or the rate of return, on that bond. Typically government debt is a safe investment with lower returns than say, stocks. Most countries raise money through similar mechanisms. In countries with a debt problem, where there is concern that the debt will be defaulted on, the rate of interest that the bond market demands on these debts typically rises, as investors consider the debt more risky. This gives us a pretty solid indicator of whether or not the market considers a country’s financial position to be viable in the long-term–the interest rate at which government debt is presently being sold, particularly bonds that last a fairly substantial length of time, like say, 10-year bonds. Let’s have a look at what interest rates 10-year bonds in some countries that have been in the news lately are going for:
10-Year Bond Interest Rates:
Greece: 25.6%
Italy: 6.0%
Spain: 6.6%
USA: 1.5%
The emergency zone for government debt, the point at which it becomes very hard to keep up with the interest payments, is around 7%. Spain and Italy, which have both been bordering on fiscal crisis, hover just under it. Greece, which is deep in crisis, soars beyond. Meanwhile, the United States is running an interest rate under 2%–especially small.
This gets more interesting, however, when you consider the rate of inflation. Inflation is the rate by which money devalues each year. While US 10-year bonds are paying 1.5% interest a year, the US economy is currently inflating at a rate of 1.66%, with previous months being higher. With the rate of inflation greater than the rate of interest on US 10-year bonds, this means that the value of US debt is falling over time faster than interest on it accumulates to keep up with it. This means that the US government borrows money at profit. Investors are actually willing to pay the United States to borrow their money. Why would investors be willing to pay the government to borrow their money if the government were on the brink of a financial catastrophe? They wouldn’t. So why is it that investors don’t buy into the debt crisis we hear about so often these days? There are several reasons.
First of all, around 53% of US debt is owed not to foreigners, but to American citizens and institutions. This means that more than half of American debt is money we owe to ourselves. Interestingly, only around 10% of American debt is actually owned by the Chinese–the persistently popular belief that China is propping up profligate spending in DC is just an outright myth. Secondly, Americans possess in foreign assets about 60% of the value of all remaining American debt, which means an additional 28% of the debt is covered by assets that go in the opposite direction. This leaves about 19% of the debt, which is debt that is actually owed to foreigners and for which there are no corresponding US-owned assets to cover it. Now, 19% of our 15 trillion-dollar deficit is about 2.85 trillion dollars. This still sounds like a lot of money, but it isn’t when you consider that the annual Gross Domestic Product of the United States (the total production of all goods and services by the US economy in a year) is $15 trillion dollars. Taken together, this means that the United States is at extremely limited risk of default and remains a very safe place to put your money. This is because it can:
- Restructure debt it owes to its own citizens
- Call in or sell off the debts of foreign nations that it owns in an emergency
But what about that 19%? This is where the power of the Federal Reserve comes in. Remember how I said that the interest rates on bonds can be reduced and even made negative by inflation? In the event of a real debt crisis, the Federal Reserve could set what’s called a “high inflation target”. This means that the Federal Reserve would deliberately try to increase inflation by increasing the size of the monetary base, printing lots of money, and so on. This would produce a devaluation of the dollar, reducing its value relative to other currencies. This would cause the real monetary value of US debt to cascade off a cliff, eliminating much of what the US government owes to foreigners. There are many precedents for such devaluations in rich countries, and they have not caused lasting damage and often led to strong growth (the classic example being the devaluation of the United Kingdom in 1992–considered horrifying at the time, it led to years of strong growth led by cheap exports caused by the devaluation).
What this all means is that the United States is well-equipped with the tools it would need to reduce its debt if it had to. It will not need to use any of these tools precisely because the market knows that it has these tools. There is no reason to believe that the United States will be unable to continue to pay its debts. It remains a safer place to put one’s money than much of what else is available–so safe, in fact, that investors are willing to pay the government to borrow their money.
Why are investors willing to do this? The reason is that investors expect persistently weak economic growth in the United States unless it takes action to increase demand. By making US borrowing costs negative, the market seeks to entice the United States into investing in itself through stimulus. Paradoxically, while the Republican Party urges us to cut spending in order to give investors confidence that we can control our debt, investors are instead worried about weak growth in the economy and have presented us with an opportunity to borrow away.
How do you know I’m right?
- 1.5% 10-Year Bond Interest Rate, negative when adjusted for inflation
- 50%+ of government debt remains American-owned, 60%+ of the remainder is accounted for in American overseas assets
- America has a floating currency and can set a high inflation target
If I was wrong, how would you know?
- 10-Year Bond Interest Rates would be over 6 or 7%
- Most government debt would be foreign-owned and unaccounted for in American overseas assets
- America would be on the gold standard or would have scrapped the Federal Reserve
What should we do because I’m right?
- Increase government borrowing and spending to increase demand
- Increase federal aid to state and local governments to stop cuts on the state and local levels
Much of what I learned here I learned originally by reading economist Paul Krugman’s blog, which can be found here:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/
Source List:
10-Year Bond Rates Data as of August 4, 2012. Source: http://www.tradingeconomics.com
Inflation Data Source: http://inflationdata.com/inflation/inflation_rate/currentinflation.asp
Holders of US Debt Source: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/07/who-owns-treasury-debt/
Foreign Assets of US Citizens Source: http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Documents/claims%20report%2010_27_2010%20with%20appendix%20tables.pdf
US GDP Source: http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=ny_gdp_mktp_cd&idim=country:USA&dl=en&hl=en&q=us+gdp
[…] a debt crisis because, unlike Spain/Italy/Greece, the USA controls its own currency–read more here). Banks lent a pile of money to home-buyers, the housing market collapsed, the homeowners […]
[…] in reducing its own demand–it’s the economic equivalent of harakiri, particularly when you don’t actually have a debt problem) and substantial evidence for the latter, evidence that was available at the time the Obama […]
[…] The United States is in a debt crisis […]
[…] key problem is that it feeds into the right wing paradigm that there is a debt problem when in fact there isn’t one. Investors still trust US public debt, as established by the still bottom-feeding rates on 10-year […]
[…] recall that the chicken little style fear-mongering about the size of American debt and deficits has little basis in reality, with interest rates on government debt under 2%, frequently running even below the inflation rate. […]
[…] however, Ryan is comparing apples with oranges when he compares US debt to European debt. As we’ve discussed in the past, the US controls its own currency and can enact its own monetary policy, while countries on the […]
[…] course, regular readers know that we do not have a debt problem in the short or medium term and that most of the money we borrow is borrowed from Americans, not […]
[…] of a debt crisis modelled after the one that has been raging in Europe. In the past, I have dismissed this argument in reference to the reality that the United States is not experiencing borrowing costs that are […]
[…] This website’s first post, on the many tools available to states that help them manage seemingly very large debt and deficits. […]
Great work, man. Just great work. I’m shocked that the hoards of the “End the Fed” conspiracy types have not flooded your page to flame the hell out of you and call you an NWO stooge or something. This is very often one of the points I try to make to people I know who spend so much time obsessing about the federal debt as though it were akin to me taking out a car loan from a bank.
Thanks, man. Unfortunately my blog doesn’t quite have the readership to draw the ire of a very large number of libertarians, though I do get one or two in the comments from time to time.
[…] Cruz opposed raising the debt limit, alleging that the size of the debt was creating a fiscal crisis. While intuitive, this position advances a deeply flawed understanding of how government borrowing works, which I pointed out in my very first blog post. […]
Interesting, although hardly real. Here’s a better look at reality – and what and WHY it’s about to happen;
‘Pentagon refuses to share intel on ISIS until Moscow’s stance on Assad changes’
‘Washington will not share intelligence data on Islamic State positions in Syria and will not accept Moscow’s offer to cooperate on rooting out terrorism until Moscow changes its position on Syrian President Bashar Assad’s future, the Pentagon said.
Ever since the start of the Russian campaign in Syria in late September, Moscow has been offering to share information with the US-led coalition against Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL), urging Washington to reciprocate. After months of extensive diplomatic efforts by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defense, and the Kremlin, the Pentagon is still refusing to enter the proposed cooperation.
“We are not going to cooperate with Russia on Syria until they change their strategy of supporting Assad and instead focus on ISIL,” US Defense Department Spokesperson Lt. Col. Michelle Baldanza told Sputnik on Friday.
NOW – from Michael Rivero, whatreallyhappened.com. PAY ATTENTION TO THE LAST PARAGRAPH. There’s the US’ ‘solution’ to the “imaginary debt” you waxed so eloquently about, even though your synopsis was just as “imaginary”, Mr Studebaker:
“ISIL/ISIS is funded, trained, and supplied by the US government; so it is absolutely no surprise that the US government wants to keep as much of it intact as possible to continue to attempt to destabilise the Al-Assad government.
But the US government has two problems here; Russia was invited to assist in getting rid of the Jihadis in Syria.
The US government was not, for obvious reasons.
Also, the Russia military has been doing an incredible job of destroying ISIL assets, sort of gobbling them up like Pacman, even without US government intelligence.
The above statement by Defense Department Spokesperson Lt. Col. Michelle Baldanza says it all: regime change is the goal, and the ONLY goal of the US government in Syria, period, end of discussion.
Russia understands that ousting al-Assad right now would be the worst possible scenario for the people of this country, because it could potentially wind up getting overtaken by Jihadists just to the right of Attila the Hun.
Logic tells me that the Russian long-term view of this situation is correct.
It is unfortunate that what I am seeing here, in terms of the US government, is a move toward a total world war, generated by a war between the US and Russia; also, unfortunately, the US government cannot see any other way out of the financial bind in which it – and the Federal Reserve – have put the financial system, not to mention its citizens, in this country.”
THAT – friends, IS REALITY. Not this hokum pasted in this article. ‘real’ or ‘imaginary’, the US IS dying. 98% of this nation just doesn’t know enough or pays enough attention to know – or ACCEPT – THIS FACT.
“The fact is that the United States is in decline and headed for a collapse not unlike the USSR. But the politicians in Washington DC and the bankers on Wall Street cannot admit to themselves that they wrecked the place, so it simply must be the fault of the eeeeevil Putin, or the eeeeevil Muslims, or the eeeeevil Iranians, or the eeeeevil Chinese, or the eeeeevil ……well…you get the idea.
The United States is dying, suicided by the money-junkies and their lackeys in Congress. All Putin is doing is making sure that the US Government doesn’t destroy the rest of the world as it thrashes about in its death throes.”
This is an elaborate conspiracy theory with no basis in reality. There is no substantive chance of war between the US and Russia in the near future, and there is no reason whatsoever to think that any such war would improve the American fiscal position (wars increase borrowing and add to the public debt).
Ahhh! THANK YOU! You have proved everything I and Michael said to be valid and true with your use of ‘Conspiracy Theory’ – the catch-all phrase every fool hides behind when they cannot rebut truth and fact.
“improving Amerika’s fiscal position” doesn’t even factor into this; The GOAL of WW3 is to HIDE the coming collapse of the US, blaming Russia/China/Iran/ISIS…..whomever is handy, and/or a gullible Amerikan public will believe. The current regime does not, will not, and cannot be seen as responsible, as the illegal/unconstitutional, so-called ‘Federal’ Reserve. Just another criminal Rothschild cartel bank – yet Amerikans actually think is ‘federal’.
“Americans are the most misled, misdirected, and therefor the most gullible people on the face of the planet” ~ Alan Hart, author
I sent your page to Michael Rivero at whatreallyhappened.com. Here is his response:
“Banking is not a science. It is a religion, and like all religions, it has rules created to benefit the masters of that religion that the people are all brainwashed to believe are real”.
WWIII would kill the very American public you imagine the government would fight WWIII to deceive. Your conspiracy theory is not only false, it’s really stupid.
Your comments show me more and more that your above article is quite possibly plagiarized, or you have a ghost writer, since you simply CANNOT REBUT – nor even seem to grasp – what it is I’m saying, and your continued use of that tired, low-IQ, dumbed-down ‘conspiracy theory’ nonsense, supports that – and that I am 100% correct.
Are you a shill for this criminal cartel, bankster-government?
Luckily, your blog does not have “quite the readership draw”, but have no fear; This “collective, room-temp IQ nation” still has the lies of the Ministry of Propaganda – the White House, and their presstitute whorespondents, the MSM clown show, to help spread nonsense like this article and the “imaginary debt” to this gullible nation – like the trained sheep, ‘James’, above, who has NO CLUE that the unconstitutional, so-called ‘Federal’ Reserve is WHY the American Revolution was fought – and the main contributor to the ruination of this country – and quite possibly, the planet; Central banking. Truly sad.
Sorry my IQ isn’t low enough to fall for this bird cage liner-nonsense, but IF WW3 commences, I believe Putin and the Chinese leaders are smart enough to simply move against the Viper’s Den – Washington (and of course, Tel Aviv), and, at this point, a great many REAL AMERICANS will stand beside those troops, for it’s damn well proven that the US military (fighting WITH and resupplying Obama’s ISIS) only has interest in violating their oath, following the illegal orders of traitors, and killing innocent civilians while unconstitutionally invading sovereign nations.
Oh. I forgot. ‘War on terror’…..
Pfffftttttttttttttt,
“America and Israel are the 2 greatest threats to world peace” ~ White House analyst.
Oh? By the way? YES – in a way, you ARE correct. The sheep-like public, most of whom STILL think 9/11 was “Islamic terrorists”, and that 3 buildings CAN turn to dust from 2 airplanes, or that Boeing aircraft CAN fly 500mph at sea level, or a 124′ wide aircraft CAN neatly “tuck itself into” a 16’ diameter hole – including 12 tons of engine), will be killed.
However, NOT by foreign troops, but by the “2 greatest threats to world peace”….
But with the coming False Flag event.
We’ll see who’s the ‘conspiracy theorist’, won’t we? That’s pathetic that you have to resort to THAT?
Wow. Clearly you were quite disturbed by my last response, to leave me this large pile of insulting rubbish. It is useless to engage with you–you have no interest in thinking through the logical implications of your unevidenced claims, which you simply assert over and over. This is precisely what conspiracy theorists do, they live in a fantasyland that has no correspondence with reality. When they are unable to convince anyone reasonable of the truth of their ludicrous claims, they rationalize by assuring themselves that they are so much smarter and see things other people (“the sheep”) don’t see. It’s a sad delusion, and I pity you.
[…] Source: The Imaginary Debt Crisis […]